Boeing 717 vs 737 size, capacity, and performance
Discover the differences between Boeing 717 vs 737 aircraft models in our comprehensive comparison. From seating capacity to range, find the perfect fit for your air travel needs.
Boeing 717 vs 737
When comparing the Boeing 717 vs 737, there are a few key differences to consider. Firstly, the Boeing 717 is smaller and typically seats around 100 to 130 passengers, making it ideal for regional routes or flights with fewer passengers. On the other hand, the Boeing 737 comes in various models with different seating capacities, ranging from around 85 to over 200 passengers, catering to a wider range of routes and passenger demands. Additionally, the Boeing 737 has a longer range compared to the 717, allowing it to fly further distances without refueling. However, the Boeing 717 is often praised for its efficiency and reliability, making it a popular choice for airlines operating in smaller markets or with limited passenger demand. Overall, the choice between the Boeing 717 and 737 depends on the specific needs and priorities of the airline, considering factors such as route network, passenger demand, and operational costs. Check out our comparison Boeing 707 vs 737Â of the to see how they differ from each other.
Boeing 717
The Boeing 717, initially known as the MD-95, is a compact and versatile narrow-body jet that has carved its niche in regional and short-haul operations. Introduced in the late 1990s, the 717 boasts efficient performance and reliability, making it a favored choice for airlines operating in smaller markets or with limited passenger demand. With a seating capacity typically ranging from 100 to 130 passengers, the 717 offers airlines the flexibility to serve routes with varying passenger loads efficiently. While it may not have garnered the same level of attention as its larger counterparts like the Boeing 737, the 717’s robust design and operational suitability continue to make it a valuable asset for carriers seeking cost-effective solutions for their regional operations.
| Attribute | Boeing 717-200 Basic Gross Weight | Boeing 717-200 High Gross Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Model / Variant | Boeing 717-200 | Boeing 717-200 |
| Flight Crew | 2 | 2 |
| Length | 37.8 meters (124 feet) | 37.8 meters (124 feet) |
| Wing Span | 28.47 meters (98 feet 5 inches) | 28.47 meters (98 feet 5 inches) |
| Tail Height | 8.92 meters (29 feet 1 inch) | 8.92 meters (29 feet 1 inch) |
| Fuselage Width (external) | 3.342 meters (10 feet 11.6 inches) | 3.342 meters (10 feet 11.6 inches) |
| Cabin Width (internal) | 3.145 meters (10 feet 3.8 inches) | 3.145 meters (10 feet 3.8 inches) |
| Passenger Capacity | 1 Class, High Density: 134 | 1 Class, High Density: 134 |
| 1 Class, Normal: 117 | 1 Class, Normal: 117 | |
| 2 Class, Normal: 106 | 2 Class, Normal: 106 | |
| Empty Weight | 30,617 kg (67,500 lb) | 31,071 kg (68,500 lb) |
| Maximum Take-off Weight | 49,900 kg (110,000 lb) | 54,900 kg (121,000 lb) |
| Cargo Capacity | 26.5 m³ (935 ft³) | 20.7 m³ (730 ft³) |
| Service Ceiling | 37,100 feet (11,300 m) maximum altitude | 37,100 feet (11,300 m) maximum altitude |
| 34,100 feet (10,400 m) cruise altitude | 34,100 feet (10,400 m) cruise altitude | |
| Cruising Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.77 |
| (504 mph, 438 knots, 811 km/h) | (504 mph, 438 knots, 811 km/h) | |
| Maximum Range | 1,430 nautical miles (2,645 km) | 2,060 nautical miles (3,815 km) |
| Fuel Capacity | 13,903 liters (3,673 US gal) | 16,665 liters (4,403 US gal) |
| Engines x 2 | Rolls Royce BR715-A1-30 | Rolls Royce BR715-C1-30 |
| Engine Thrust | 82.3 kN (18,500 lbf) | 93.4 kN (21,000 lbf) |
Boeing 737
The Boeing 737, often referred to simply as the 737, is one of the most iconic and widely used aircraft in the world. First introduced in the 1960s, the 737 has undergone numerous iterations and improvements over the decades, solidifying its reputation as a reliable and versatile workhorse for airlines globally. With its narrow-body design, the 737 is primarily used for short to medium-haul flights, making it an essential tool for both regional and mainline carriers. Its popularity is attributed to its efficiency, flexibility, and adaptability to various operational needs. Over the years, the 737 has evolved from its original series to the Classic, Next Generation (NG), and now the MAX series, incorporating advanced technologies and innovations to enhance performance, fuel efficiency, and passenger comfort. With its enduring legacy and continuous innovation, the Boeing 737 remains an integral part of the aviation industry, connecting people and communities around the world.
Variants of Boeing 737:
- Boeing 737 Original Series (737-100 and 737-200)
- Boeing 737 Classic Series (737-300, 737-400, and 737-500)
- Boeing 737 NG (Next Generation) Series (737-600, 737-700, 737-800, and 737-900)
- Boeing 737 MAX Series (737 MAX 7, 737 MAX 8, 737 MAX 9, 737 MAX 10)
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-200
The Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-200 are both airplanes, but they have some differences. The Boeing 717-200HGW is a bit longer than the Boeing 737-200. Its wingspan is also a little wider. Although the 717-200HGW has slightly more wing area, the 737-200 is taller. Both planes have two engines, but the 717-200HGW’s engines produce more thrust, giving it a total thrust advantage over the 737-200. Despite this, the 737-200 has a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), meaning it can carry more weight. The 737-200 also has a longer range, so it can fly farther without needing to refuel. However, the 717-200HGW cruises at a slightly faster speed. When it comes to carrying passengers, the 737-200 can accommodate more passengers than the 717-200HGW. So, while both planes have their strengths, such as the 717-200HGW’s speed and thrust, and the 737-200’s range and passenger capacity, they cater to slightly different needs.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737-200 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 30.53 m (100 ft 2 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 28.35 m (93 ft) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 91.10 m2 (981 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 11.29 m (37 ft) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 77 kN (17,400 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 154 kN (34,800 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 58,740 kgs (129,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 4,200 km (2,268 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.73 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 115 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-300
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-300, there are notable differences.The Boeing 737-300 is longer and taller than the Boeing 717-200HGW, but the 717-200HGW has a slightly wider wingspan. Despite the smaller wingspan, the 717-200HGW has a similar wing area. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737-300’s engines produce more thrust, giving it a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW. Additionally, the 737-300 has a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry more weight. In terms of range, the 737-300 outperforms the 717-200HGW, being able to fly longer distances without refueling. However, the 717-200HGW cruises at a slightly faster speed. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737-300 can accommodate more passengers than the 717-200HGW. Overall, while both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737-300’s higher thrust and passenger capacity and the 717-200HGW’s faster cruise speed, they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 33.40 m (109 ft 7 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 28.88 m (94 ft 9 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 105.40 m2 (1,135 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 11.13 m (36 ft 6 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 98 kN (22,000 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 196 kN (44,000 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 62,800 kgs (138,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 5,000 km (2,700 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.73 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 128 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-400
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-400, there are several differences to consider. The 737-400 is longer and taller than the 717-200HGW, but they have a similar wingspan. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737-400’s engines produce more thrust, resulting in a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW. Additionally, the 737-400 has a significantly higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry more weight than the 717-200HGW. In terms of range, the 737-400 has a slightly longer range compared to the 717-200HGW. However, the 717-200HGW cruises at a slightly faster speed. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737-400 can accommodate more passengers than the 717-200HGW. Overall, while both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737-400’s higher thrust, higher MTOW, and larger passenger capacity, and the 717-200HGW’s faster cruise speed, they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737-400 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 36.45 m (119 ft 7 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 28.88 m (94 ft 9 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 105.40 m2 (1,135 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 11.13 m (36 ft 6 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 105 kN (23,500 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 210 kN (47,000 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 68,000 kgs (150,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 3,850 km (2,079 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.73 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 146 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-500
Comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-500, there are some noticeable differences. The 737-500 is shorter in length and has a similar wingspan to the 717-200HGW. Both planes have two engines, but the 717-200HGW’s engines produce more thrust, giving it a higher total thrust compared to the 737-500. Additionally, the 717-200HGW has a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry more weight than the 737-500. In terms of range, the 737-500 has a slightly longer range compared to the 717-200HGW. However, the 717-200HGW cruises at a slightly faster speed. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737-500 can accommodate slightly fewer passengers than the 717-200HGW. Overall, both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses. The 717-200HGW offers higher thrust and passenger capacity, while the 737-500 provides a longer range. Thus, the choice between them depends on specific needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737-500 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 31.00 m (101 ft 8 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 28.88 m (94 ft 9 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 105.40 m2 (1,135 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 11.13 m (36 ft 6 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 89 kN (20,000 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 178 kN (40,000 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 60,000 kgs (132,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 4,444 km (2,400 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.73 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 108 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-600
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737-600, there are several differences to consider. The 737-600 is shorter in length but has a significantly wider wingspan and larger wing area compared to the 717-200HGW. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737-600’s engines produce more thrust, resulting in a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW. Additionally, the 737-600 has a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry more weight than the 717-200HGW. In terms of range, the 737-600 outperforms the 717-200HGW, being able to fly longer distances without refueling. Moreover, the 737-600 has a slightly higher cruise speed compared to the 717-200HGW. However, both aircraft have a similar passenger capacity, with the 737-600 accommodating slightly more passengers. Overall, while both aircraft have their own strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737-600’s larger wing area, higher thrust, longer range, and faster cruise speed, and the 717-200HGW’s smaller size and potentially lower operating costs, the choice between them depends on specific operational needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737-600 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 31.20 m (102 ft 4 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 35.80 m (117 ft 5 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 125.00 m2 (1,345 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 12.60 m (41 ft 4 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 101 kN (22,700 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 202 kN (45,400 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 65,000 kgs (143,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 5,600 km (3,024 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.785 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 108 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 7
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 7, there are notable differences to consider. The 737 MAX 7 is slightly longer, taller, and has a wider wingspan and larger wing area compared to the 717-200HGW. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737 MAX 7’s engines produce significantly more thrust, resulting in a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW.
Additionally, the 737 MAX 7 has a much higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry significantly more weight than the 717-200HGW. In terms of range, the 737 MAX 7 significantly outperforms the 717-200HGW, being able to fly much longer distances without refueling. Moreover, the 737 MAX 7 has a slightly higher cruise speed compared to the 717-200HGW. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737 MAX 7 can accommodate significantly more passengers than the 717-200HGW.
Overall, while both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737 MAX 7’s larger size, higher thrust, longer range, higher cruise speed, and greater passenger capacity, and the 717-200HGW’s potentially lower operating costs and smaller size, the choice between them depends on specific operational needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737 MAX 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 36.56 m (119 ft 11 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 35.92 m (117 ft 10 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 127.00 m2 (1,367 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 12.30 m (40 ft 4 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 119 kN (26,785 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 238 kN (53,570 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 80,286 kgs (177,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 7,130 km (3,850 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.79 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 153 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 800
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 800, several differences stand out. The 737 MAX 8 is longer, taller, and has a wider wingspan and larger wing area compared to the 717-200HGW. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737 MAX 8’s engines produce significantly more thrust, resulting in a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW. Additionally, the 737 MAX 8 has a substantially higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry significantly more weight than the 717-200HGW. In terms of range, the 737 MAX 8 significantly outperforms the 717-200HGW, being able to fly much longer distances without refueling.
Moreover, the 737 MAX 8 has a slightly higher cruise speed compared to the 717-200HGW. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737 MAX 8 can accommodate significantly more passengers than the 717-200HGW. Overall, while both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737 MAX 8’s larger size, higher thrust, longer range, higher cruise speed, and greater passenger capacity, and the 717-200HGW’s potentially lower operating costs and smaller size, the choice between them depends on specific operational needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737 MAX 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 39.52 m (129 ft 8 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 35.92 m (117 ft 10 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 127.00 m2 (1,367 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 12.30 m (40 ft 4 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 125 kN (28,035 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 250 kN (56,070 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 82,191 kgs (181,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 6,570 km (3,548 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.79 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 178 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 900
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 9, there are significant differences to note. The 737 MAX 9 is notably longer, taller, and has a wider wingspan and larger wing area compared to the 717-200HGW. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737 MAX 9’s engines produce substantially more thrust, resulting in a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW. Additionally, the 737 MAX 9 has a significantly higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry substantially more weight than the 717-200HGW. In terms of range, the 737 MAX 9 significantly outperforms the 717-200HGW, being able to fly much longer distances without refueling.
Moreover, the 737 MAX 9 has a slightly higher cruise speed compared to the 717-200HGW. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737 MAX 9 can accommodate substantially more passengers than the 717-200HGW. Overall, while both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737 MAX 9’s larger size, higher thrust, longer range, higher cruise speed, and greater passenger capacity, and the 717-200HGW’s potentially lower operating costs and smaller size, the choice between them depends on specific operational needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737 MAX 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 42.16 m (138 ft 4 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 35.92 m (117 ft 10 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 127.00 m2 (1,367 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 12.30 m (40 ft 4 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 130 kN (29,317 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 260 kN (58,634 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 88,314 kgs (195,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 6,570 km (3,548 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.79 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 193 |
Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 10
When comparing the Boeing 717-200HGW vs Boeing 737 MAX 10, there are significant differences to consider. The 737 MAX 10 is notably longer, taller, and has a wider wingspan and larger wing area compared to the 717-200HGW. Both aircraft have two engines, but the 737 MAX 10’s engines produce substantially more thrust, resulting in a higher total thrust compared to the 717-200HGW. Additionally, the 737 MAX 10 has a significantly higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), allowing it to carry substantially more weight than the 717-200HGW. In terms of range, the 737 MAX 10 significantly outperforms the 717-200HGW, being able to fly much longer distances without refueling.
Moreover, the 737 MAX 10 has a slightly higher cruise speed compared to the 717-200HGW. When it comes to passenger capacity, the 737 MAX 10 can accommodate substantially more passengers than the 717-200HGW. Overall, while both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, such as the 737 MAX 10’s larger size, higher thrust, longer range, higher cruise speed, and greater passenger capacity, and the 717-200HGW’s potentially lower operating costs and smaller size, the choice between them depends on specific operational needs and preferences.
| Specification | Boeing 717-200HGW | Boeing 737 MAX 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 37.80 m (124 ft) | 43.80 m (143 ft 8 in) |
| Wingspan | 28.44 m (93 ft 4 in) | 35.92 m (117 ft 10 in) |
| Wing Area | 93.00 m2 (1,001 ft2) | 127.00 m2 (1,367 ft2) |
| Height | 8.87 m (29 ft 1 in) | 12.30 m (40 ft 4 in) |
| Engines | 2 | 2 |
| Thrust per Engine | 93 kN (21,000 lbf) | 130 kN (29,317 lbf) |
| Total Thrust | 186 kN (42,000 lbf) | 260 kN (58,634 lbf) |
| MTOW | 54,800 kgs (121,000 lbs) | 92,000 kgs (203,000 lbs) |
| Range | 3,815 km (2,060 nm) | 6,110 km (3,299 nm) |
| Cruise Speed | Mach 0.77 | Mach 0.79 |
| Passenger Capacity | 106 | 204 |
As for the main differences with the latest Boeing 737-10 model, the MAX 10 offers enhanced performance, longer range, and increased passenger capacity compared to its predecessor, the 737 MAX 9. Additionally, the MAX 10 incorporates various aerodynamic improvements and advanced technologies to improve fuel efficiency and reduce operating costs. The MAX 10 also features a redesigned cabin layout to accommodate more passengers comfortably, making it a more attractive option for airlines seeking to maximize their revenue potential on high-density routes. Overall, the Boeing 737 MAX 10 represents a significant advancement in the 737 MAX family, offering airlines a versatile and efficient option for meeting the demands of modern air travel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the comparison between the Boeing 717-200HGW and the various models of the Boeing 737 MAX series highlights the diverse range of options available to airlines in the narrow-body aircraft market. While the Boeing 717-200HGW offers a smaller size and potentially lower operating costs, the Boeing 737 MAX series presents a wide array of choices with varying capacities, ranges, and performance capabilities. Each aircraft model has its own set of strengths and weaknesses, catering to different operational needs and preferences of airlines worldwide. Whether it’s the shorter-range, smaller capacity of the 717-200HGW or the longer-range, higher capacity of the MAX 10, airlines have the flexibility to select the aircraft that best suits their specific routes and passenger demands.
FaQs
What are the main differences between the Boeing 717-200HGW and the Boeing 737 MAX series?
The main differences include size, capacity, range, and performance capabilities. The 717-200HGW is smaller in size with lower passenger capacity and range compared to the various models of the Boeing 737 MAX series, which offer larger capacities, longer ranges, and enhanced performance.
Are there any notable safety differences between the two aircraft?
Both the Boeing 717-200HGW and the Boeing 737 MAX series are certified to meet stringent safety standards set by aviation authorities. However, it’s worth noting that the Boeing 737 MAX series underwent extensive recertification and modifications following the temporary grounding due to safety concerns related to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS).
How does the seating capacity of the Boeing 717 compare to the Boeing 737?
The Boeing 717 typically has a seating capacity of around 100 passengers, while the Boeing 737 can accommodate a wider range of capacities depending on the variant, from around 85 to over 200 passengers.
What are the advantages of the Boeing 737 over the Boeing 717?
The Boeing 737 offers a larger range of seating capacities and longer range capabilities compared to the Boeing 717. It also benefits from ongoing production and development, with newer models featuring advanced technologies and improved fuel efficiency.
